"Mr Hyde" wrote:But this doesn't answer the question of why you think it is un-acceptable :P
Considering Alton Towers happily take well in excess of £100 from every average sized family that visits. I feel it is unacceptable for them to ignore guests who did not enjoy their day for
whatever reason. You pay for a service, you should get that service. If you feel you didn't, the park should be respond - not just take your money and run.
"Mr Hyde" wrote:Everyone is, of course different but there is a common level where I would suggest the majority of people would say a complaint subject isn't worth moaning about.
That is where the park, or any customer service organisation needs to be establishing the difference between an expression of dissatisfaction and a complaint. They're two completely different things, but are still very important to both the company and customer.
For example. I'm not happy that Apple don't offer Blu-Ray on their Mac's yet I wouldn't exactly complain about it. Though, Apple could improve customer satisfaction by offering this extra. Obviously, there are reasons they don't - it doesn't mean I can't be unhappy with it.
"Mr Hyde" wrote: However, my gripe is with those who complain about silly things.
Again, silly by whose definition? Yours, or the customer whose complaining?
Also the examples you use again, inadequate parking, fewer seats unless near revenue generating outlets, may seem trivial things to complain about, but could be addressed if those responsible wanted to. The fact a theme park chooses not to provide adequate parking for the number of guests it's attracts, or seats across the park due to logistical or financial incentives does not make complaints about the matter any less valid.
You may also want to try telling
Watchdog that wasps are not worth complaining about.
It's clear we have very different views on this subject but I do feel strongly that you should not discount someones complaint just be you think it's trivial.