James-Allgood wrote:samcam wrote:warrenashcroft wrote:Here you go:
Enjoy!!
thank you so much!!!!!!!
theyve been deleted send them to me please?
TimeAgain wrote:Cool, if anyone could get a snap of the monopoly, I'd love to see that!
Themeparksandy1981 wrote:What I hate about this is they still plugging the Smiler during prime time tv. Not sure if every region sees the ad but as the park don't have no clue when the ride gonna open. The normal GP don't know that the ride not open after watching that ad as they not fans of theme park websites. It's false advertising and Thorpe Park got done for it when they advertised Vortex new for 2001 and it wasn't even on site yet.
lewis97 wrote:Just a recent news article I came across HERE
Apparently there are '16 dizzying upside down moments'... and there is no mention of the ride being late, just that it's set to open in the next few weeks... Not the best article, I must say.
brick60000 wrote:lewis97 wrote:Just a recent news article I came across HERE
Apparently there are '16 dizzying upside down moments'... and there is no mention of the ride being late, just that it's set to open in the next few weeks... Not the best article, I must say.
Not sure whether I am over thinking things, but that article says 16 upside down moments. I thought the coaster was only being marketed as having 14 inversions.
EDIT: Or is it just the article being inaccurate?
lewis97 wrote:brick60000 wrote:lewis97 wrote:Just a recent news article I came across HERE
Apparently there are '16 dizzying upside down moments'... and there is no mention of the ride being late, just that it's set to open in the next few weeks... Not the best article, I must say.
Not sure whether I am over thinking things, but that article says 16 upside down moments. I thought the coaster was only being marketed as having 14 inversions.
EDIT: Or is it just the article being inaccurate?
As I highlighted, the article is incorrect. There are only 14 inversions.
arsenalfan-1 wrote:Tbh, I doubt it. We've seen the POV and there is nowhere where another 2 inversions can go.
arsenalfan-1 wrote:Tbh, I doubt it. We've seen the POV and there is nowhere where another 2 inversions can go.