"electricBlll" wrote:"Re-ridability" is another cheap excuse.
Think about it, is there really such a thing as "reridability"? Not really.
Yes, I know what it means, but it is a silly term and not important really. Who cares how many times one person rides something? As long as the ride pulls the crowds in the first place. Riders should feel that they want to ride again because it is a great ride, not because it has some guns in it.
They didn't "need" to make it "reridable". That sounds to me like a bit of Tussaudes propaganda, to be honest. It is such a shame that a once high profile and classic ride was placed in their hands... :(
"seanyboyuk" wrote:The queueline going into the forest area should be scrapped and a small family flat could go there
In my opinion, that just makes it worse. It isn't as if because it is outdoors the terrible idea becomes a great potential investment. It isn't as if: "Ah, well, in that case the idea is brilliant! Why didn't Alton Towers already think of this?", if you know what I mean.no, it's outdoors, and they come towards you on a hidden mechanical thingy...
Can you really see Gloomy Wood, an area meant to be sinister and dark, with a laser zombie shoot out game stall in it? :shock: