UK theme parks from another point of view!

 
User avatar
Liam
TT Member
TT Member
Topic Author
Posts: 3410
Joined: March 2003
Location: London / Warwick
Contact:

The Business of Running Theme Parks: Product vs Experience

Thu Jun 02, 2011 11:32 pm

Almost all of the major theme park attractions in this country have been hoovered up by the private equity firm The Blackstone Group. I remember saying back in 2007 that this was not good for the park despite others getting sucked into the PR spin that this would enable Alton Towers (as Merlin's "Jewel in the Crown") to become one of the world's leading theme parks once more.

Private equity firms are only interested in one thing. Buying, bulking, and then selling off for the highest possible profit. They are the business equivalent of a pig farm where pigs are bought, fattened up as quickly as possible and then sent to the slaughterhouse regardless of quality.

It is striking that the private equity owners of these theme parks are the very same owners of the Southern Cross care homes that have been in the news for the past week. These care homes have got into such financial difficulty that their patients have faced a significant reduction in the quality of care and now face possible imminent eviction with bankruptcy for the company. How did a longstanding healthy company get into this mess? Well Blackstone got involved. They stripped all the assets from the business by replacing equity with debt. Eg. They sold Southern Cross care home properties and then rented them back. Except, now that rents have increased they can no longer afford to exist in their own buildings because of the huge debts incurred as a result.

I'll leave others to fill in those of you who don't know, but the same trick has been done with this theme park. Alton Towers no longer own Alton Towers. Alton Towers pays rent to exist at Alton Towers.

And leaving that problem aside, there are others that filter down too...
The whole business attitude, that extends from Blackstone, and that also thrives in Merlin; filtering down to Alton Towers and Thorpe Park etc. is a flawed one for running a theme park.
Private equity firms are not a bad thing in themselves. Many businesses can benefit from them investing in the right place and making them an efficient venture. It's perfect for companies buying and selling products.
But like the care homes, theme parks don't sell a product - the PR people who claim they actually are, are fundamentally mistaken. They're selling life itself; they're selling a comfortable experience in care homes, and a fantasy experience in theme parks.

The things that say value for money in these parks are not necessarily quantifiable in the short or medium term. But these same things are what make people come in the first place and what make people want to come again. These sensory details, these stories, these elements of "magic" even; these things can't appear on Merlin's graphs because they are ephemeral. It is the legacy of experiences set up in the 90s that feeds Alton Towers’ profits today.

There needs to be an exceptional person put in charge of this key area and inserted right at the top with the authority to step in and query the decisions of each and every department.

It's not surprising that John Wardley is so popular in this regard when you consider he brings his talents from the world of theatre. It's not surprising that those theme parks that are owned by film companies or individuals in the entertainment business tend to be so popular...
It's not just because of the investment power behind them (though that is important in kick-starting the cycle) it is because they fundamentally understand how to interact with the emotions of their audience. They put considerable time and effort into things that seemingly won't bring in a single extra penny for the park... Except that they know it will, actually, in the long term; these details build over time into a collective experience, which, perhaps only on a subconscious level, affects the customer in a way that will make them return or recommend so much more readily than those who have just had a day of quick thrills on rides. A 2 minute thrill on a rollercoaster is a product; it's what surrounds it that makes it an experience. And that's why what they did to Oblivion was such a fundamental mistake.

Alton Towers no longer has total control over its own future. The horse has long bolted now on equity vs debt. but it still has control of the business it runs within that frame. If they can change to a more experience-orientated/detailed/magical - even - way of doing business, and can convince Blackstone to invest along these lines instead, then there are great and exciting years ahead for this park.
Image
 
JB1985
TT Member
TT Member
Posts: 83
Joined: April 2011

Re: The Business of Running Theme Parks: Product vs Experience

Fri Jun 03, 2011 7:41 pm

Excellent well thought out post raising some very very good points...in short your right the magic will be lost and the park will be looking for cheap quick fix attractions (thirteen ?) to bring as much money is as quickly as possible...

Such a shame
 
User avatar
James6
TT Member
TT Member
Posts: 794
Joined: May 2009

Re: The Business of Running Theme Parks: Product vs Experience

Fri Jun 03, 2011 9:13 pm

Whilst I agree, some area's of Merlin haven't been particularly great, I genuinely think that you are looking to much into this and that the same won't happen to the parks. If not solely because of the fact they are a LOT more profitable than a care home, and have a much larger revenue stream.


If you truly believe this, then why have Merlin just invested in 3 B&M rides (rather than cheaper alternatives)... why are they spending even a single penny on theming? Look at Raptor and tell me that is the product of a company wanting to make a quick buck. As much as people seem to enjoy complaining about Th13teen, if we'd had a thrill coaster, everyone would have complained that we needed a family coaster, which we did after the removal of Black Hole and Corkscrew. And as far as family coasters go, I genuinely think you'd struggle to find a better family coaster when taking into account everything (throughput, marketing appeal etc)

Additionally, why would Alton spend such a huge amount of money developing a World First? Other, cheaper and more gimmicky World Firsts could be used as the USP.

Yes, mistakes have been made, AKA Oblivion, and yes I find myself as disappointed with Merlin, and Alton in particular as many of you here. But I'm beginning to think things are getting too far, Merlin clearly has long term plans for all the parks.

Don't think that's come across as I meant but fingers crossed :P
If you go down to the Towers today, you\'d better ride Th13teen. :P
 
thefatone
TT Member
TT Member
Posts: 877
Joined: January 2011
Location: Hidden behind an ancient bookcase..

Re: The Business of Running Theme Parks: Product vs Experience

Fri Jun 03, 2011 9:30 pm

Plus, to add in here, they haven't exactly done everything typical of private equity firms.

Originally they tried to float, then they got investment from another firm. It's quite rare for more than one company to own a company run by private equity.

The lego family have a 30% stake in merlin as well, and with that would bring in some big differences to how it would otherwise be run.

I still firmly believe that the parks are better off with merlin - if tussauds continued as they had done, we'd have a few flamingolands.

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 118 guests